Monday, August 31, 2015

Dear Students - Modern History Tells You What to Think, Not How to Think

More radical ideas about interpreting texts from a dangerous-thinking teacher.



Dear Students:

Many of your analyses of the texts for this assignment were off track. So many of you merely jump to conclusions about the writing without really analyzing it, or coming to grips with what the texts actually say.
As you read historical documents keep in mind that our interpretation of such documents is skewed through the lens of our modern interpretations and sensibilities. It is not good historical practice to filter all history through the lens of one particular philosophy of social structure.
All of you have grown up in a world where postmodernism has affected our interpretations of history. Postmodernism was a reaction against the idea that there can be absolutes, and introduced the concept of relativism. (See http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1077292/postmodernism). What this created for today's historians is a philosophy of history that basically says one interpretation of history is as good as another.
This presents a double standard which has imposed all sorts of conflicting interpretations on original documents, many of which have nothing to do with the writer's intent. In the present day, much of history is now filtered through the lens of oppression ideology, meaning most interpretation of history sees events and people as mere oppressors, rather than as events and people. The problem with this trend in history is that it tells you, as students, what to think, rather than teaching you how to think.
Your textbook is a modest example of the trend to interpret history through the eyes of a postmodernist philosophy. More and more textbooks interpret history as a laundry list of oppression. Over the years, I've watched the authors of the textbook revise the text to replace basic concepts and ideals expressed by the people of the time, only to interpret them through the lens that all history revolves around the abuse of power and oppression ideology. Your textbook is one of the few left that sometimes writes the story of what happened instead of trying to convince you, as students, how "bad things were in the olden days."

I want you to be aware of the influence of historical trends in your own interpretations of history so that you can begin to read and understand historical documents in their own context, rather than reacting to documents because you are influenced by a philosophy of history that pervades academics in today's world.

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

A Letter to My Class As We Start US History


As we begin another fall semester, once again it's time to remind students of a few things which directly reflects their ability to think for themselves. In our postmodern world, I frequently have to warn students with a bullhorn to step away from from postmodernism before they hurt themselves.

Since most of the students who enter my classes have absolutely no idea what postmodernism is, nor the influence it has on their thinking, I try to point out the basic flaws with the interpretive garbage they've been fed in high school and in college.

Here's part of the announcements that we start with in my class:
In high school and in some college courses, when writing essays, you may have been taught to offer claims (opinions) and then justify your opinions with examples from the text. This is not a good means of coming to an understanding of historical texts. This method is, unfortunately, taught in many high school history books and in the newer high school curriculum. Unfortunately as well, most college textbooks (including our own) fall into the trap of forcing poor interpretations onto the texts without trying to understand the plain meaning. 
This is a very poor way of understanding history. By trying to form opinions, without first understanding the texts, you bring biases to the text which have been taught to you by people who despise history.
Please make an honest effort to understand the meaning of the additional readings texts without bringing your own opinions into their interpretation. You'll find a whole new way of thinking that will open up your mind to what history can actually teach us. I'd much rather you just summarize a text than tell me your opinions about whether you believe it or not. You'll learn more about history if you form opinions about the texts after you've read them, rather than before you read them.
The problem with postmodernism is that its arguments are entirely circular. Students are indoctrinated in its Mysteries at an early age, and so never see the double standards. Postmodernist circular reasoning creates students who have little or no ability to recognize the fallacies of the arguments. It prevents students from understanding sound arguments as well.

So students, as we start another new year, I urge you all to step away from postmodernism before you hurt yourselves.